영어 분리보문소구 영역에 대한 자질 기반 접근 : 화제와 초점을 중심으로
A Feature-Based Approach to English Split CP-Space: Focusing on Topic and Focus
- 주제(키워드) 도움말 Topic , Focus , Split CP-space , Information Structure , Syntactic Features
- 발행기관 강릉원주대학교 일반대학원
- 지도교수 도움말 구자혁
- 발행년도 2023
- 학위수여년월 2023. 8
- 학위명 박사
- 학과 및 전공 도움말 일반대학원 영어영문학과
- 세부분야 해당없음
- 실제URI http://www.dcollection.net/handler/kangnung/000000011437
- UCI I804:42001-000000011437
- 본문언어 영어
초록/요약 도움말
본 연구의 주된 동기는 영어 보문소 영역(CP-space)에 대해 Chomsky의 (1998, 1999, 2001, 2005, 2007, 2008) 제안과 Rizzi (1997, 2001b, 2003)의 제안을 절충적으로 적용하여, 좀 더 설명적 타당성을 지닌 자질 점검에 기반을 둔 영어 분리 보문소구 영역의 통사적 구조를 구안하는 것이다.
more목차 도움말
Table of Contents
I. Introduction 1
Ⅱ. Previous Suggestions on English Focus Structure 5
2.1. Higgins’s (1973) and Emonds’s (1976) COMP-Substitution Analysis 6
2.2. Chomsky’s (1977) and Haegeman & Guéron’s (1999) Analysis 8
2.3. Baltin’s (1982) Left-Adjoined to TP Analysis 11
2.4. Authier’s (1992) CP-Recursion Analysis 13
2.5. Lambrecht’s (1994) Focus Structure in English 15
2.6. Rizzi’s (1997, 2001b, 2003) Split CP Hypothesis 19
2.7. Breul’s FocP Hypothesis (2004) 25
2.8. Summary of Chapter Ⅱ 28
Ⅲ. Theoretic Foundations 30
3.1. Properties of Complementizers 30
3.1.1. Clause Typing of the Embedded Clauses 32
3.1.2. Clause Typing of the Root Clauses 34
3.2. Chomsky’s (1999) Uniformity Principle 36
3.3. Chomsky’s (1999, 2001, 2005) Probe-Goal Feature-Checking 40
3.4. Chomsky’s (1998, 1999, 2001, 2005) Phase Theory 42
3.5. Attraction Generalization 45
3.6. Pesetsky & Torrego’s (2000) Suggestion for T-to-C Movement 47
3.6.1. T-to-C Asymmetry and the Nature of Nominative Case 47
3.6.2. The that-Trace Effect and the Nature of English that 50
3.6.3. Obligatory that in Embedded Declarative Complementizer 54
3.6.4. The That-Omission Asymmetry 55
Ⅳ. Some Proposals of A Feature-Based Approach to English Split CP-Space 58
4.1. Information Structure Begins in the Numeration 60
4.2. Information Structure in Question-Answer Pairs 62
4.3. Wh-Phrases Do Not Generally Clause-Type the Question 64
4.4. Reinterpretation of Numeration 65
4.5. Only One FocP in Split CP-Space 67
4.6. Reinterpretation of Thematization/Extraction 68
4.7. A Proposal of No VP-Movement in Locative Inversion Construction 73
4.8. Reinterpretation of Expletive There 75
4.9. PPs Move More Easily than Nominal Arguments Do 77
4.10. Syntactic Differences between Topic and Focus 80
Ⅴ. Application of A Feature-Based Approach to Split CP-Space 84
5.1. XP-movement to Split CP-space in Root Clauses 84
5.1.1. Subject Fronting (Short Topicalization) 84
5.1.2. Prepositional Phrase Fronting 85
5.1.3. vP/VP-Fronting 87
5.1.4. Adjectival Phrase Fronting 89
5.1.5. Embedded Clause Fronting in Root Clauses 90
5.1.6. Contrastive Focus in Root Clauses 94
5.1.7. Interrogative Root Clauses 95
5.1.8. Preposed Negative Constituents in Root Clauses 98
5.1.9. Full Inversion in Root Clauses 100
5.1.10. Multiple Fronting in Root Clauses 102
5.1.11. Movement to Root spec-TopP or FocP from Embedded Clauses 105
5.2. XP-movement to spec-TopP or FocP of Embedded Clauses 107
5.2.1. Embedded Declarative Clauses 107
5.2.2. Embedded Interrogative Clauses 108
5.2.3. Fronting in Restrictive Relative Clauses 111
5.2.4. Aux-Support for PNCs in Embedded Clauses 114
5.2.5. Multiple Fronting in Embedded Clauses 117
5.2.6. XP-movement to Both Root and Embedded Spec-TopP or Spec-FocP 118
5.3. Mitigated that-Trace Effect 120
Ⅵ. Further Examination on FI 124
6.1. Locative Inversion 124
6.1.1. A Refutation to Null Expletive There 125
6.1.2. No Definiteness Effect and No Weak Crossover in LIC 127
6.1.3. Testifying Null Expletive There in LIC 128
6.2. Quotative Inversion 132
6.3. Predicate Inversion 136
Ⅻ. Conclusion 141
BIBLIOGRAPHY 145
ABSTRACT 154
