『Will』과 『Be going to』 의 의미적 차이에 대한 연구
A Study on the Semantic Differences between 『Will』 and 『Be going to』
- 발행기관 강릉대학교 교육대학원
- 지도교수 박노민
- 발행년도 2008
- 학위수여년월 2008. 8
- 학위명 석사
- 학과 및 전공 영어교육 전공
- 원문페이지 62 p.
- 본문언어 한국어
초록/요약
Grammar has been one of the primary issues in our country's English education. It produced lots of disputes on that, and that is increasingly considered important for accurate communication. 『Will』 functions as a tense auxiliary and modal auxiliary, and it's not an easy task to discriminate between the two functions since they are often interchangeable, being concerned about the future tense. As the future is not as certain as the past or present time, one is bound to be subjective to some extent when he or she makes even the most obvious estimate, and the meaning of modality is justified in that sense. The purpose of this study was to examine existing theories and concrete cases about the usages of 『will』 and 『be going to』 based on the semantic differences between the modality of the two in an effort to find out their distribution and frequency. To lay the theoretical foundation for the study, the fundamental concepts of the tense and future tense were described, and the relationship between the future tense and modality was discussed. Existing theories of『will』 and『be going to』 were briefly reviewed, and their semantic differences related to modality were investigated. Epistemic and deontic modality were selected in this study as the criteria of analysis according to Coates(1983: 204) semantic classification. Therefore the criteria of analysis involved 'predictability,' 'prediction,' 'willingness' and 'intention.' The first two belonged to epistemic modality, and the latter two were in the category of deontic modality. The cases of utilizing the two and their frequency in spoken and written English were investigated. As a result of analyzing the frequency of the two auxiliaries in spoken and written English, the following findings were given: The most dominant use of the two in spoken and written English was 'predictability' that belonged to epistemic modality, and the second most prevailing one was 'prediction' that belonged to epistemic modality. The third one was 'intention' in the category of deontic modality, and the fourth one was 'willingness' in the category of deontic modality. Modal auxiliaries represent the psychological attitude of people, and expose the complicated and delicate feelings of speakers. And it's required to have a correct understanding of the semantic differences of modality marked by context specificity and equivocalness.
more목차
Ⅰ. 서 론 = 1
1.1. 연구의 목적 = 1
1.2. 연구의 범위 규정 = 2
Ⅱ. 본 론 = 3
2. 이론적 배경 = 3
2.1. 시간과 시제 = 3
2.2. 미래시의 의미 = 3
2.3. 미래시와 서법성(Modality)의 관련성 = 5
3. 미래시제의 표현 방법 = 7
3.1.『Will』과『Be going to』의 기존의 분석 = 8
3.1.1.『Will』 = 8
3.1.2.『Be going to』 = 10
3.2. 의미상의 차이점 = 12
3.2.1. 인식적 서법성 = 12
3.2.1.1. 예상성(Predictability) = 13
3.2.1.2. 예측(Prediction) = 16
3.2.2. 의무적 서법성 = 18
3.2.2.1. 자발성(Willingness) = 18
3.2.2.2. 의도(Intention) = 19
3.3.『Will』과『Be going to』의 의미와 기능에 따른 차이 = 22
3.3.1. 화자의 의도 결정 시점:'즉흥성'vs'계획성' = 22
3.3.2. 다른 사건과의 관련성:'원인, 조건'/'결과'관계 = 23
3.3.3.『Will』의 상호작용적 기능 = 24
3.3.4. 현재 지향성 = 25
3.3.5. 격식성 = 25
3.3.6. 확신성 = 26
4.『Will』과『Be going to』에 대한 학생들의 인지도 설문조사 = 27
4.1. 설문 조사의 목적 및 방법 = 27
4.2. 정답률 및 정답자 분포 = 29
4.3. 설문 조사의 결과 = 29
4.3.1.『Will』분석 = 29
4.3.2.『Be going to』분석 = 32
5.『Will』과『Be going to』의 용법별 빈도수 조사 = 34
5.1. 구어체 영어의 용법과 빈도수 = 34
5.1.1.'Love Actually'에서 나타난『Will』문장 = 35
5.1.2.'Love Actually'에서 나타난『Be going to』문장 = 37
5.1.3. 구어체 영어의『Will』과『Be going to』의 빈도수와용법 분류 = 37
5.2. 문어체 영어의 용법과 빈도수 = 43
5.2.1.'Time'에서 나타난『Will』문장 = 43
5.2.2.'Time'에서 나타난『Be going to』문장 = 49
5.2.3. 문어체 영어의『Will』과『Be going to』의 빈도수와용법 분류 = 51
5.3. 구어체 영어와 문어체 영어의 비교 분석 = 54
Ⅲ. 결 론 = 56
참고문헌 = 58
설문조사에 사용한 설문지 = 60
