항목	Soms Field	내용	언어
제목	dc.title	대학의 진로교육 운영실태와 발전방안에 관한 연구
제목(제2언어)	somsterms.translated	Study on conditions and improvement of career education in university
저자	dc.creator	류동희
저자(제2언어)	somsterms.otherName	Yoo, Dong-Hee
소속	somsterms.affiliation	강릉대학교 교육대학원
발행기관	dc.publisher	강릉대학교 교육대학원
지도교수	somsterms.advisor	손영민
발행년도	dcterms.issued	2008
학위수여년월	somsterms.awarded	2008. 8
자료유형	somsterms.subType	학위논문
학위명	somsterms.thesisDegree	석사
학과 및 전공	somsterms.major	교육행정전공
원문형식	dc.format	application/pdf
원문크기	dcterms.extent	764543 bytes
원문매체	dcterms.medium	application/pdf
원문페이지	somsterms.page	vi, 65 p.
본문언어	dc.language	한국어
초록/요약	dcterms.abstract	This study analysed conditions of the career education system, the recognition of the need for career education operation carried out in Korean university and considers strategies for the improvement and development of career education. The study comprises four parts. Firstly, research into manpower, facilities, budget and the program operation situation for career education operation in universities according to establishment type, location, number of students and whether the research is government or privately supported. Secondly, research into students’ career awareness by analysing career decisions, career consulting experiences, career aptitude test experiences, number of participants in career education according to university location, gender, major and student grades. Thirdly, research into the level of recognition of students’ satisfaction, evaluations of students and career education managers for operating career education, preference for pre-arranged programs, importance of procedure, and finally, contents of career education. Fourthly, research into how career education managers recognise plans for raising abilities and professionalism of career education mangers. In addition, the research covers the level of recognition of students and managers regarding key factors for initiating career education. Prior to embarking on this study, theoretical background and previous studies on the following areas were consulted; prospects and changes of career environment, concept and specificity of career education and operating types of universities` career education. The research data was compiled by means of a questionnaire totalling 78 questions; completed by career consulting managers and a questionnaire totalling 50 questions; completed by 3rd and 4th year university students on a 4 year university undergraduate course. 106 questionnaires were answered by 174 career education managers at universities offering 4 year undergraduate university courses and 343 questionnaires answered by 3rd and 4th year university students at 5 different universities in the metropolitan area (Seoul, Kyeon-gi Province and Incheon) and other provincial areas for comparison. The managing document for this study has been computerised by SPSS 14.0 for Windows. According to the studyt, the following differences and suggestive points have been deduced. Firstly, national, provincial, local universities and universities with a large student roll have better conditions because national and provincial universities are afforded financial support from government. Furthermore, local university students have relatively poor employment prospects. Consequently, local universities have implemented specific measures designed to improve career education conditions with the primary objective of improving students’ chances of obtaining future employment. Also, universities with a large student roll have better investment conditions for career education. Secondly, students have low awareness concerning career decisions and career education due to a lack of confidence in their futures caused by anxiety from difficult and unfamiliar career environments. Additionally, a lackadaisical approach adopted by many students, often results in a random career path choice job. This problem is exacerbated by the inadequacies of career education in universities and their failure to synchronise the undergraduate courses, career education and employment path. Thirdly, career education managers score a higher satisfaction for operating career education than students. There is not much difference in terms of the career education teaching syllabus and operation and preference of career education programs because personal desires for indicated items on the questionnaires largely depends on the individual. So, career education should offer more diverse syllabi both in relation to teaching methods. It should offer a balanced and tailor-maid education rather than selective immersion education based on level of importance. Also proper feedback should be encouraged to enhance program operation positively. Fourthly, to develop career education, improvement of staff consulting ability and provision of appropriate manpower are required. In order to increase student participation, which is one of the key factors for developing career education, students` should be allowed to make suggestions pertaining to the program operation as much as possible and nurture a group spirit. Overall, we can see that, as a result of increasing recognition for the need and importance of career education, universities are making an effort to operate effective career education programs. Students also wish to participate fully in career education. However, the quality of career decisions made by students is low. Students and staff cite the reason for this as a question of students’ willingness to participate. Therefore, focus must be placed on the motivation and encouragement of students in career education. Universities provide sound, quality and comprehensive education, offering opportunities to better prepare students to make the right career choice. Career education should work in balance with major courses studied by students to enable the optimum career path choice and perhaps, more importantly, career security for students after graduation. Ultimately, the responsibility falls to universities and society, which must work cooperatively towards their common objective.	영어
목차	dcterms.tableOfContents	Ⅰ．서 론 = 1 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1 2. 연구의 과제 = 2 3. 용어의 정의 = 3 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 4 1. 진로 환경의 변화와 전망 = 4 2. 대학의 진로교육 개념 및 특성 = 9 3. 대학의 진로교육 운영실태 = 13 4. 선행 연구의 고찰 = 18 Ⅲ. 연구 방법 = 21 1. 표집 대상 = 21 2. 측정 도구 = 22 3. 자료의 처리방법 = 24 Ⅳ. 연구결과 및 해석 = 25 1. 진로교육 운영실태 = 25 2. 학생들의 진로의식 = 32 3. 진로교육 인식정도 = 43 4. 진로교육 발전방안 = 47 Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론 = 50 1. 요약 = 50 2. 결론 = 51 <참고문헌> = 54 <부록> 1. 설문지(진로교육담당자용) = 55 2. 설문지(학생용) = 61